Inside: At the heart of the Marpac 980A is a high-efficiency Jakel J238-038-3325 C Frame Motor. Ok, it's just a fan.
The Marpac Sleepmate/Soundscreen 980A is rated "less than 40 watts". I was concerned that this sound machine might use more power than our iBook (which previously served as our sound machine via the nifty Noise utility), so I decided to test the Marpac with a KillaWatt.
Ok, finally, here's a video of the unit in action, at BOTH speeds!
Overall, we're very happy with the noise that the machine produces. Although it is a lot different than the Noise application, I think it is more soothing and has a much larger range of sound, probably due to the fact that the speakers in an iBook can't create any bass to speak of. I am also very sensitive to "sound loops" produced by some electronic noise machines, and of course this machine is completely immune to that. Overall it is a simple, low-tech solution to an old problem, and more elegant than a box fan.
2 comments:
Thanks for this. I was wondering how the power consumption compared with a box fan, which typically uses 50-100 watts. The Sleepmate is the clear winner in this category. My main issue with it is that it just doesn't create that rich, deep noise that a box fan creates. It obviously also does not circulate the air in the room, which I find nice when sleeping. By my quick calculation, the Sleepmate would save nearly $30/year over the box fan on electricity.
Thanks. This is really useful info.
Post a Comment